Current location:Global Grandstand news portal > world
Hong Kong's Messi mess: A distraction from more important things
Global Grandstand news portal2024-05-22 06:00:20【world】8People have gathered around
IntroductionA rare moment of public preoccupation has hit Hong Kong as a result of the incident which would in d
A rare moment of public preoccupation has hit Hong Kong as a result of the incident which would in due course probably be called Messigate by the popular tabloids, if we had any left.
The hero of this debacle is Lionel Messi, a footballer of sublime gifts who is now getting a bit long in the tooth. As footballers sometimes do at this stage of their careers, he has moved from the highly competitive European scene to the US of A, where the football is worse but the money is better. Not so much a swan song as a goose with golden eggs song.
So, Messi now twinkles his agile toes for a new club called Inter Miami. The name is a straight lift from a legendary Italian club, Inter Milan. Inter Miami is not yet legendary.
Many of the spectators were extremely offended, and a speech at the end of the match from David Beckham, who used to be a footballer but nowadays is famous for being famous, was booed.
Subscribe to HKFP's twice-weekly newsletter for a concise round-up of local news and our best coverage. Unsubscribe at any time - we will not pass on your data to third parties.
Processing… Success! You're on the list. Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.Cue outrage on all channels that fans had been scammed. The internet frothed with bitter complaints. Some irate fans resorted to the Consumer Council. Column inches were devoted to Messi’s medical symptoms and history. Academics were interviewed. Chinese-state media suggested that it was a result of “external forces” seeking to embarrass the city.
After the organising magazine announced that – given the circumstances – it would not collect the government subsidy, our leaders could wade in. Secure, for a change, from charges that they had misplanned an event or wasted taxpayers’ money, they were free to express warm solidarity with disgruntled fans and call for money to be returned to them.
Which is all very well, and has provided a great deal of harmless media fodder. It has also, rather regrettably, consumed a large chunk of the rather small period allowed for people to comment on the upcoming national security legislation.
This is a pity. I was surprised by a recent offering in China Daily’s English version from Lau Siu-kai. Lau is an emeritus professor of sociology – a polite academic way of saying retired – and a consultant to the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macau Studies, a think tank where democratic ideas are drowned.
Those of us who were here at the time will remember as the high point of Lau’s career his prediction in 2003 that the July 1 march against the government’s first attempt to pass such legislation would only attract 30,000 or so people – a forecast which turned out to be about 500,000 people light.
However, if you want to know what the government is plotting then Lau is your man, so I waded through his thoughts on “colour revolutions.” This involved a very elaborate string of definitions, understandable in a way because Lau could hardly be expected to use the common-sense definition, which would be something like “a popular movement aiming at the overthrow of a despotic regime.” For Lau a colour revolution is a Bad Thing.
He then proceeded to explain how the national security law would prevent colour revolutions in Hong Kong. Which included some interesting observations. For example:
It will no longer be possible for political groups to freely participate in the leadership, planning, organization and mobilization of a “color revolution”. The Ordinance will stipulate: “If the Secretary for Security reasonably believes that prohibiting the operation or continued operation of any local organization in the HKSAR is necessary for safeguarding national security, the Secretary for Security may by order published in the Gazette prohibit the operation or continued operation of the organization in the HKSAR,” and “If a local organization is a political body and has a connection with an external political organization, the Security for Security may by order published in the Gazette prohibit the operation or continued operation of the local organization in the HKSAR.
This seems a little stark. No obligation to tell society first, or give it a chance to explain itself; no avenue for appeal? It also seems a bit unnecessary. In 2018 the police withdrew registration as a society from the Hong Kong National Party on national security grounds. We are plugging a non-existent loophole.
Then there is this:
It will be difficult for hostile forces to spread false information to slander the central government and the HKSAR government, to instigate hatred, division and opposition in society, and to instigate, lead and organize unrest. That is because they would be committing the offense of espionage under the Ordinance, which includes “colluding with an external force to publish a statement of fact that is false or misleading to the public, and the person, with intent to endanger national security or being reckless as to whether national security would be endangered, so publishes the statement; and knows that the statement is false or misleading.
I quite see why one might wish to have a law against false statements, although this seems to be covered by the sedition offence which we already have. But, at least in English, I do not see how this can be classed as espionage. This is a concern because espionage is generally treated as a very serious matter, whereas publishing a statement might in some circumstances be a fairly minor offence, if for example the publication was seen by very few people.
It used to be said that the British army was always preparing to fight the last war, not the next one. Something rather similar seems to be afflicting our government. The Hong Kong Journalists Association is “not recognised” because of two disagreements in 2019, a play is cancelled because the founder of the drama group tweeted something in 2019, a legislator making reasonable points about tourism and police work is accused of speaking “dangerously” and sounding like some of the things that were said in… 2019.
Now we have national security legislation which appears to be an attempt to criminalise anything and everything people did in 2019 which didn’t please the government. The fear of an encore is unwarranted. The people who wanted the five demands have got the message. They are either going or gone. Relax.
Address of this article:http://gambia.fightbigfood.org/content-89c099902.html
Very good!(1)
Related articles
- Singapore Airlines: 1 dead, others injured after London
- Update: China unveils Shenzhou
- Xi extends Spring Festival greetings to military veterans
- Feature: Namibian city market bolsters local product commerce
- UN maritime tribunal says countries are legally required to reduce greenhouse gas pollution
- Chinese, Australian FMs hold strategic dialogue
- Rwandans honor fallen politicians as genocide commemoration week ends
- Biden 'decides' reply to deadly attack in Jordan
- Guardians ruin Francisco Lindor's Cleveland homecoming, trip Mets 3
- Interview: BRI cooperation with China boosts infrastructure connectivity in Africa: AU official
Popular articles
Recommended
Russia begins nuclear drills in an apparent warning to West over Ukraine
Interview: China sees rapid urbanization, integrated development in all fields
Interview: BRI cooperation with China boosts infrastructure connectivity in Africa: AU official
New technologies of smart agriculture on display at 5th CIIE in Shanghai
Pogacar extends Giro lead to over 7 minutes after winning altered Stage 16 amid protests at start
Interview: Congo
Wang: China willing to work for global peace and security
Zhongguancun Forum builds platform for global sci
Links
- School camp bus breaks down, then catches fire while being towed
- Super Rugby Aupiki final live updates: Blues Women v Chiefs Manawa
- Government departments defend staffing increase in late 2023
- Free school lunches: Studies show better attendance, improved alertness
- What the long
- WorkSafe interim chief executive Steve Haszard resigns months into job
- More than 350 school building projects under review, Ministry of Education documents show
- Local board opposes boundary change for Ōtara community
- Biden says he expects Iran to attack Israel soon, warns: 'Don't'
- Haiti PM Ariel Henry in Puerto Rico as gang violence continues